What Should I Do With Negative Feedback at Work? Craig Dowden on the Three Triggers That Make Us Defensive

Craig Dowden breaks down the three psychological triggers that make negative feedback at work so hard to hear, and the specific questions that turn defensiveness into growth.
Scroll

In this solo episode, Craig Dowden goes deep on how leaders can receive negative feedback at work without shutting down. Drawing on Doug Stone and Sheila Heen's Thanks for the Feedback, he unpacks the truth trigger, the source trigger, and the identity trigger, plus the exact questions to ask when feedback stings.

TL;DR

What are the three triggers that make negative feedback hard to receive? Craig Dowden identifies the truth trigger (dismissing feedback because of poor delivery), the source trigger (dismissing feedback based on the relationship with the person giving it), and the identity trigger (dismissing feedback that challenges a core self-belief).

What book does Craig Dowden reference for handling feedback? He references Thanks for the Feedback: The Science and Art of Receiving Feedback Well by Douglas Stone and Sheila Heen.

What should I ask when feedback feels tied to my identity? Ask for specific examples of the behavior in question rather than arguing against the label itself, and stay curious about what might be a blind spot.

What Should I Do With Negative Feedback at Work?

What should I do with negative feedback at work? According to executive coach and leadership psychologist Craig Dowden, host of the Do Good to Lead Well podcast, the honest answer starts with noticing your own reaction before you respond at all. In this solo episode, Dowden builds on a previous conversation about why senior leaders struggle to receive honest feedback, this time zooming in on the personal skill of how we show up in the moment someone tells us something we don't want to hear.

Most advice online focuses on how to give feedback well. Dowden flips that script. He argues that how you receive feedback, especially critical feedback, matters just as much for your growth and for whether people keep being honest with you in the future. Drawing on Doug Stone and Sheila Heen's book Thanks for the Feedback, he lays out three specific triggers that hijack our reactions, and what to do instead.

The Truth Trigger: When You Dismiss Feedback Because of How It Was Delivered

The first trigger Dowden identifies is the truth trigger, our tendency to reject feedback because of how it was delivered rather than what was actually said. If someone is blunt, inelegant, or unkind in their delivery, we often conclude the content itself must be wrong. Two things can be true at once: the delivery was clumsy, and the substance is still valid.

A related trap shows up when someone shares several pieces of feedback at once. If one observation feels inaccurate, we tend to throw out everything else along with it, even the parts that were fair. Dowden calls this a logical gap, one flawed data point doesn't invalidate the rest of the feedback.

His fix, borrowed directly from Doug Stone, is counterintuitive. Instead of asking "what's wrong with this feedback," ask "what's right about this feedback." As Dowden puts it in the episode:

"What they say is even better is to say, what's right about this feedback. What are the elements, or what is an element, that is accurate, that does reflect something that I can see." -Craig Dowden

Reframing the question shifts you from defense mode into learning mode, and makes it far more likely you'll actually act on what's useful.

The Source Trigger: When Who Said It Changes How You Hear It

The second trigger is about the source, meaning who delivered the feedback and the state of your relationship with them. If you don't get along easily with a colleague, it's tempting to dismiss their feedback as invalid simply because the relationship feels strained. The same happens when a trusted colleague gives tough feedback during a rocky patch; suddenly the feedback gets written off as "just tension talking."

Here's the counterintuitive part: people who like us less, or who have less emotional investment in protecting our feelings, are often the ones most willing to tell us the truth. People who are close to us frequently hold back precisely because they don't want to damage the relationship. Dowden suggests treating discomfort with the source as a signal to lean in rather than dismiss, and asking the same reframed question from the truth trigger: what might be right here, even though I don't love who's saying it?

The Identity Trigger: When Feedback Hits Who You Think You Are

The third and, according to Dowden, most powerful trigger involves identity. When feedback challenges a quality you believe defines you, like being a good listener, a respectful colleague, or someone who is never a micromanager, defensiveness spikes fast. Dowden shares a personal story about hiring a third-party firm to interview his coaching clients, only to learn that some found him not a great listener. As someone whose entire identity was built around being an evidence-based, attentive coach, the feedback landed like "an arrow through the heart."

After sitting with it, Dowden realized the real issue wasn't listening at all, it was over-explaining research and methodology (what communications expert Matt Abrahams calls telling the time versus building the clock). He also shares a story about two executives on the same leadership team who both rated themselves 10 out of 10 on the value of respect, yet defined respect in opposite ways, one equating it with constant reassurance, the other with blunt honesty. The lesson here is when feedback threatens identity, get more curious, not less, and ask for specific examples rather than arguing the label.

How Do I Ask for Feedback When My Manager Never Gives It?

If your manager rarely offers feedback, don't wait for a scheduled review to bring it up. Dowden's framework suggests approaching the request through curiosity rather than confrontation, asking directly what you're doing well and where you could improve, and specifically inviting critical input rather than only fishing for praise. Because most people, according to Dowden, actually want feedback but rarely get it consistently, taking the initiative signals that you can handle it well, which research from Zenger Folkman associates with higher-performing leaders overall. You can also make it easier for your manager by asking narrow, specific questions, such as how a particular project or presentation landed, rather than a vague how am I doing, since specificity lowers the bar for them to respond honestly.

What Questions Should I Ask During a Feedback Meeting?

The questions Dowden recommends during a feedback meeting are designed to counteract the three triggers in real time. Instead of internally asking what's wrong with this feedback, ask out loud or to yourself, what's right about this feedback, to stay open rather than defensive. When the source of feedback feels uncomfortable, ask what it is about the source of the feedback that I may be relying on to dismiss it, a question that keeps you honest about whether you're discounting valid input because of relationship friction. And when feedback touches something tied to your identity, ask for concrete examples: "Can you give me some examples? How might I show up differently next time?" Dowden is clear that you don't have to agree with every example offered, but hearing them gives you real information about how your behavior lands on other people, which is valuable regardless of whether you accept the underlying label.

Why Receiving Feedback Well Matters More Than You Think

Dowden closes the episode by pointing to research suggesting that top-performing leaders are skilled at both giving and receiving feedback, not just one or the other. When leaders model good feedback reception, it signals to everyone around them that honest, even difficult, observations are welcome, building the kind of culture Kim Scott describes as radical candor. Skipping this skill has a direct cost: people simply stop sharing honest feedback with leaders who react poorly to it, which means the leader stops improving precisely when they need it most.

Check out these articles to help hone your skills even further: